dB describes a logarithmic ratio; dBA and dBC identify different frequency weightings applied to acoustic measurements, while dBFS describes a digital signal relative to full scale. Decibel Reader shows Estimated dB from digital RMS plus an offset. It does not implement A or C weighting and is not a certified sound-pressure meter.

The letters matter when comparing a browser number with a handheld meter. Matching numbers do not establish matching measurement methods.

Which reading am I looking at?

References and weighting are different parts of a reading
LabelMeaningIn Decibel Reader
dBA logarithmic ratio that needs a reference and contextShown only with the Estimated label for the main reading
dBAAcoustic level with A frequency weightingNot measured
dBCAcoustic level with C frequency weightingNot measured
dBFSDigital level relative to full scaleRaw RMS in Settings and frequency-band intensity in the spectrum

A raw RMS level and a spectrum-band level both use dBFS, but they summarize different quantities. A spectrum bar describes a frequency band; the raw RMS describes the combined digital input over a time window. Do not add the bar labels together to obtain the main reading.

Why can dBA and dBC differ for the same sound?

A and C weighting change how much different frequencies contribute to a sound-level measurement. A weighting attenuates very low frequencies more strongly than C weighting. A bass-heavy sound can therefore produce different A- and C-weighted values on the same instrument.

The OSHA Technical Manual explains the weighting networks and distinguishes them from an unweighted acoustic measurement. An unweighted browser estimate is not automatically a Z-weighted measurement: microphone sensitivity and frequency response still need to be established.

There is no universal number to add to a dBC reading to obtain dBA. The difference depends on the frequency content. Similarly, selecting a display offset in Decibel Reader cannot create an A-weighting filter.

What does the browser display offset do?

Decibel Reader calculates 20 × log10(RMS) from the digital input, then adds the display offset. The uncalibrated default is +94 dB. A hypothetical raw value of −35 dBFS would therefore display 59 Estimated dB. This is an arithmetic example, not a collected measurement or a known microphone sensitivity.

Settings shows the raw value and the adjustment. Reference alignment replaces the default offset using a shared observation with a reference meter. The result remains a browser estimate. Read the measurement method for continuous sampling and its disclosed fallback.

How should I compare with a reference meter?

  1. Note the reference instrument’s weighting, response setting and calibration status.
  2. Keep the microphones in a similar sound field with a steady ordinary source.
  3. Use the reference-alignment sample and the reference reading for the same interval.
  4. Check another ordinary condition without changing the offset to hide disagreement.

Agreement at one condition only checks the alignment there. A different source or frequency mixture can reveal a new difference. The 10-second alignment guide explains the full workflow.

Common questions about the units

Can I rename Estimated dB as dBA after alignment?

No. Reference alignment changes a constant offset, not the frequency weighting or the device’s acoustic validation.

Does a negative dBFS value mean negative sound?

No. A negative dBFS value means the digital signal is below its full-scale reference. It does not describe negative acoustic pressure or a negative noise source.

Can I compare two phones by their displayed dB number?

Only with care: different microphones, gain and processing can produce different scales. For informal before-and-after checks, use the same device, placement and settings.

Can I use the Estimated dB number in an exposure table?

No. A table specified in measured dBA needs the appropriate acoustic measurement. Decibel Reader’s estimated number, chart reference lines and saved report do not supply that measurement.

Sources & further reading

Source links checked October 11, 2026.